This is
probably, in my opinion, why Voice Studies and Production is a module
classified under drama. Corrigan (1997) has mentioned that a there is relevance
of the teaching of voice with psycho-physical techniques – in other words to
bridge the mental and physical aspects (forming a mind/body unity) when it
comes to speech production. Rolfing, mentioned in the article, seem to hint at
the floor work that we do weekly in class to achieve some kind of alignment at
our spinal cords and body– but I might be wrong. And the reason we do these
floor work, humming and vocalization exercises each week might be in line with
what some of the principles of psycho-physical techniques assumes – that we (a)
don’t try too hard, (b) only look at end-product, (c) repeat the exercises over
time, (d) don’t overanalyze and (e) let it happen. (Corrigan, 1997, pp. 95-96)
It might seem counterproductive to heed these advice as we naturally want to
improve ourselves in the shortest time possible and to overdo things. I do
practise what is done in class at home but more often than not I question these
activities – what am I trying to achieve here? Disinterest often makes me panic
a little.
Another
thing that struck me in Corrigan’s article is that it mentions “our musculature
is a reflection of our mental state, and reciprocally that our mental states
affect and shape our musculature” (1997, p. 98) It somehow correlates to what
Claire said in class: to be confident in our posture and poise allows us to be
more focused and speak better, and this cycle just goes on. It also explains
why people do power poses before heading on for a speech or performance.
Perhaps to connect language to dramatic text, we have to “look” the part before
we can try to “sound the part”. Hence, it makes sense for Claire to incorporate
the drama classes together with speech. In the fun and light hearted environment,
we “let go” and allow our bodies to produce the sounds we want.
In class,
we used a variety of ways to use spoken language in dramatic text (or play)
such as pitch, pauses, intonation etc. However, it is a challenge to convey if
we do not put ourselves into it. (i.e. if we do not feel it, or are too
self-conscious to feel) Apart from achieving a high level of vocal control,
there is a need to inject or project some of our personality into the text we
are reading to make it come alive. For myself, I think achieve a balance
between technical control and the injection of feeling is vital. Too much or
too little of either may just make the text I read lose its essence or
relatability. After all, speech is meant for listening – there is always a
receptive aspect to it.
References:
Corrigan, M. (1997). ‘Psycho-Physical Techniques and Their Relevance to
Voice and Actor Training’, in Hampton, M. & Acker, B. (Eds.), The Vocal Vision: Views on Voice by 24
Leading Teachings, Coaches & Directors. New York: Applause
No comments:
Post a Comment